the Supreme Court struck down state bans on interracial marriage. The day is named for the monumental case, Loving v. Virginia, and the interracial couple at its center, Richard and Mildred Loving.

“I knew it was going to the Supreme Court,” Cohen told The Associated ... serendipitous about the fact that the case would be called Loving vs. the Commonwealth of Virginia.” ...

"I knew it was going to the Supreme Court. And I definitely thought there was something serendipitous about the fact that the case would be called Loving vs the Commonwealth of Virginia." ...

The Supreme Court on Wednesday voted 6-3 to allow the Virginia election commission to resume a controversial voter purge ...

Paivi Rasanen, a member of the Finnish Parliament who previously served as the nation’s interior secretary, has spent years ...

He wrote that the court has a "duty" to "correct the error" of previous Supreme Court ... made no mention of the case that legalised interracial marriage in 1967 - Loving v Virginia.

The prosecution in the case has argued the focus on communities of color was intentional by the pair. The defense for the two men has argued up to the Supreme Court that criminal charges should be ...

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to intervene in a bunch of controversial cases, leaving in place ... But some progressive voters aren’t loving the strategy. Seth Meyers opens up ...

The physical evidence in a 30-year-old Boulder murder case is being reviewed following the finding that a Colorado Bureau of ...

Despite objections from her family, John Devine oversees the trust of Elvie Kingston, a clear violation of Texas’ judicial ethics rules, experts said. His wife is also her legal guardian.